Dakine Mission Fish Pack 40L Gear and Tackle Backpack Griffin Gray New
Kylebooker Dakine Mission Fish Pack 40L vs. Orvis & Redington: A Detailed Comparison for Anglers
As an avid angler, choosing the right gear backpack is crucial for organizing and transporting your fishing essentials. The Kylebooker Dakine Mission Fish Pack 40L is a popular option, but how does it compare to similar offerings from premium brands like Orvis and Redington? In this review, we’ll analyze the features, durability, and overall value of these backpacks to help you decide which one offers the best performance for the price.
1. Design & Storage Capacity
Kylebooker Dakine Mission Fish Pack 40L
The Dakine Mission Fish Pack 40L is designed specifically for anglers, featuring a large main compartment, multiple zippered pockets, and rod holders. The Griffin Gray color scheme gives it a sleek, professional look. It includes a waterproof TPU-lined pocket for wet gear, a sunglass pocket, and MOLLE webbing for additional attachments.
Orvis Pro Fishing Backpack
Orvis is known for its high-end fishing gear, and their Pro Fishing Backpack offers 35L of storage with a modular design. It includes removable fly boxes, a hydration bladder sleeve, and reinforced rod tubes. However, it’s slightly smaller than the Dakine pack and lacks some of the external attachment points.
Redington Crosswater Backpack
The Redington Crosswater Backpack is another strong contender, with 30L capacity and a streamlined design. It features a padded laptop sleeve, internal organization pockets, and a removable waist belt. While functional, it doesn’t have as much specialized fishing storage as the Dakine or Orvis models.
Verdict: The Dakine Mission Fish Pack 40L wins in terms of storage space and specialized fishing features, making it ideal for anglers who carry a lot of gear.
2. Durability & Weather Resistance
– Dakine Mission Fish Pack: Made from 600D polyester, it’s water-resistant and includes a TPU-lined wet storage pocket for damp waders or clothing.
– Orvis Pro Fishing Backpack: Uses heavy-duty nylon with DWR coating, but lacks a dedicated waterproof pocket.
– Redington Crosswater Backpack: Features water-resistant fabric, but not as rugged as the Dakine or Orvis models.
Verdict: The Dakine pack offers the best balance of durability and weather resistance, especially with its TPU-lined wet storage.
3. Comfort & Ergonomics
– Dakine: Features padded shoulder straps, sternum strap, and breathable mesh back panel for long hikes.
– Orvis: Offers adjustable load lifters and a contoured back panel for better weight distribution.
– Redington: Has a slimmer profile, but lacks the same level of padding as the other two.
Verdict: The Orvis pack is the most comfortable for extended wear, but the Dakine is a close second.
4. Price & Value
– Dakine Mission Fish Pack 40L: $120-$150 (best value for features)
– Orvis Pro Fishing Backpack: $200+ (premium pricing)
– Redington Crosswater Backpack: $100-$130 (budget-friendly but fewer features)
Verdict: If you want high-end materials and brand prestige, the Orvis is great, but the Dakine offers the best balance of price and functionality. The Redington is a decent budget option but lacks specialized fishing storage.
Final Recommendation
For anglers who need maximum storage, durability, and weather resistance at a reasonable price, the Kylebooker Dakine Mission Fish Pack 40L is the best overall choice. While the Orvis is more comfortable and the Redington is cheaper, the Dakine provides the best bang for your buck with its specialized fishing features and rugged construction.
If you’re looking for a premium option, go for Orvis, but if budget is a concern, the Redington is a solid alternative. However, for most anglers, the Dakine Mission Fish Pack 40L delivers the best performance-to-price ratio.
Happy fishing! 🎣