Hodgman Bantam Lightweight Nylon Waders (Model 13985) (Size M)

# **Kylebooker Hodgman Bantam Lightweight Nylon Waders (Model 13985) (Size M) – A Comprehensive Review on Value for Money**

For avid anglers, a reliable pair of waders is an essential investment. Whether you’re fly fishing in shallow streams or wading through muddy banks, comfort, durability, and affordability are key factors to consider. The **Kylebooker Hodgman Bantam Lightweight Nylon Waders (Model 13985, Size M)** have gained attention in the fishing community for their lightweight design and budget-friendly price. But how do they really perform in terms of value for money? Let’s dive into a detailed review.

## **Build Quality & Material**
The Hodgman Bantam waders are constructed from **lightweight nylon**, making them easy to wear for extended periods. Unlike heavy rubber or neoprene waders, these are designed for **warm-weather fishing**, offering breathability without excessive sweating. The seams are **tape-sealed**, which enhances waterproofing, though they may not be as rugged as fully welded seams found in premium models.

One concern with lightweight waders is durability, especially in rough terrains. While these waders hold up well in moderate conditions, they may not be the best choice for bushwhacking through dense vegetation or rocky riverbeds. However, for casual anglers or those who fish in relatively calm waters, the material provides a good balance between comfort and functionality.

## **Fit & Comfort**
The **Size M** fits most average-sized adults comfortably. The adjustable **suspenders** help customize the fit, preventing sagging while allowing freedom of movement. The **bootfoot design** (if included) ensures convenience, though some users prefer stockingfoot waders paired with separate boots for better ankle support.

Since these waders are **uninsulated**, they are best suited for **spring and summer fishing**. If you fish in colder conditions, layering up with thermal wear underneath is necessary. The lightweight nature reduces fatigue, making them ideal for long fishing trips where mobility is crucial.

## **Waterproofing & Performance**
The **tape-sealed seams** do a decent job of keeping water out, but they are not as robust as higher-end models with reinforced stitching. Some users report minor leakage after prolonged use, especially around stress points like the knees. However, for the price, the waterproofing is acceptable as long as you avoid deep submersion or extreme conditions.

The **gravel guards** (if present) help keep debris out of your boots, a useful feature for shore anglers. The lack of additional pockets or D-rings might be a downside for those who like to carry extra gear, but the simplicity keeps the design lightweight.

## **Price & Value for Money**
One of the biggest selling points of the **Hodgman Bantam waders** is their **affordability**. Priced significantly lower than premium brands like Simms or Patagonia, they offer a **budget-friendly entry point** for beginners or occasional anglers. While they may not last as long as high-end waders, their cost-effectiveness makes them a reasonable choice for those who don’t fish frequently in harsh environments.

## **Pros & Cons Summary**
### **Pros:**
✅ Lightweight & breathable for warm-weather fishing
✅ Affordable price for budget-conscious anglers
✅ Adjustable suspenders for a secure fit
✅ Decent waterproofing for casual use

### **Cons:**
❌ Not as durable as heavy-duty waders
❌ Potential for seam leakage over time
❌ Limited insulation (not ideal for cold water)
❌ Fewer storage options compared to premium models

## **Final Verdict: Is It Worth It?**
If you’re a **casual angler** looking for an **affordable, lightweight pair of waders** for fair-weather fishing, the **Kylebooker Hodgman Bantam Lightweight Nylon Waders (Model 13985, Size M)** offer solid value. They won’t replace high-performance waders for extreme conditions, but for the price, they deliver decent comfort and functionality.

For serious anglers who frequently face rugged terrains or cold waters, investing in a more durable pair might be worthwhile. However, if you need a **cost-effective, no-frills option** for occasional trips, these waders are a practical choice.

Would you recommend them? **Yes, for the right user—budget-friendly and functional for light to moderate fishing conditions.**

Would love to hear your thoughts if you’ve tried them! Tight lines! 🎣